Breaking News and Updates

Supreme Court Rules for Colorado Inmate Who Says State Waived Timeliness Defense, ABA J Law News Now, April 24, 2012
Veterans in the Criminal Justice System: Defending Conditions of the Mind, LLRX, April 20, 2012
Clemency: Justice to the Nth Degree, NYLJ, April 20, 2012
Jury Statute Not Violated by Protester, Judge Rules, NY Times, April 19, 2012
Conviction Set Aside, Nassau Crime Lab Cited, Newsday, April 18, 2012
Convicted Defendants Left Uninformed of Forensic Flaws Found by Justice Dept, Wash. Post, April 16, 2012

For more news and information, see Drug Law Reform, NY Criminal Defense, and NY Criminal Law and Procedure.

NYSDA Testimony Heard on Budget, Representation of Veterans

NYSDA performs functions that help the State fulfill its constitutional duty to provide effective legal representation, provide mandate relief, and further justice, Executive Director Jonathan E. Gradess explained at a joint legislative budget hearing on Jan. 30, 2012. For his testimony, click here. (PDF)

Gradess also testified at a Feb.29, 2012 hearing on "The Criminal Defense of New York's Veterans: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Veterans" held by the New York State Senate Committee on Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. He sought funding for a NYSDA Military and Veterans Defense Project to reform and improve how the justice system handles cases in which past military experiences may have played a role. Read that testimony here (PDF).

Benefit Performance for IDP

A "Law and Disorder" performance by Labe Richmond, and a party, will be held on Mar. 29, 2012 to benefit the Immigrant Defense Project in NYC. For information, click here.

Board and Office of Indigent Legal Services

The Office of Indigent Legal Services and nine-member Indigent Legal Services Board created in Part E of the Public Protection budget (PDF), chapter 56 of the Laws of 2010 have a growing impact on public defense services in New York State. NYSDA works with the Office and with public defense providers across the state to improve the quality of public defense services.

NYSDA and Others Question Queens Pre-Arraignment Interrogation

NYSDA has joined seven other groups seeking amicus status in cases challenging the Queens District Attorney's pre-arraignment interrogation program. The groups have asked the Second Department to consider an amicus brief arguing that the program is unconstitutional, unlawful, and unethical. Under the program, individuals in custody who are ready to be arraigned but have been unable to obtain counsel are diverted into an interrogation room; there, a prosecutor advises them that there is an urgent need for them to divulge information about the subject matter of their arrest directly to the prosecutors prior to going to court.